Peer Reviewing

Peer review is one of the quiet infrastructures of scholarship. It is where claims are tested, methods are examined, assumptions are challenged, and emerging ideas are strengthened before they enter the wider scientific and intellectual record.

I approach reviewing as both a scientific and collegial responsibility. My evaluations consider methodological rigor, validity, theoretical coherence, evidentiary support, transparency, and the significance of a study’s contribution. I also value constructive review: identifying limitations clearly while helping authors strengthen the precision, clarity, and intellectual reach of their work.

My reviewing spans interdisciplinary scholarship across education, psychology, AI in education, learning sciences, computing and mathematics education, the humanities, and related areas.